I have decided to use the Declaration of Independence as the topic to compare within the two books. Although both were historically informative, I was much more interested in Hakim's version. Wood's "The American Revolution" includes many facts, dates and characters that were all relevant in leading up to the written declaration. However, I had a hard time keeping my focus on this book. It was factual and accurate, but it didn't soak me in or make me feel involved. This would not be suitable for younger students.
On the flip side, I really enjoyed Hakim's version in "A History of US", starting with the backround information about Thomas Jefferson. He was young and shy, but had a reputation for writing well. The reasons for writing the declaration were clearly stated and explained, including the issues with slavery which had to be removed from the document because of the times. And of course, the pictures and political cartoons added to the interest for me. Hakim's style is more like plain language storytelling, which I appreciate.
I think that the concept of storytelling is an important one when trying to interest students in history. Too often traditional approaches take the "story" out of the content. Comparing a document like the Declaration is a good way to analyze the two approaches.
ReplyDeleteI agree...I felt that the Wood book provided accurate, informative information for someone like myself who confuses the time periods way back then. It spells it out from the very beginning. I also agree that is was a bit dry to read. I think kids would get bored also. The Hakin book is excellent for kids to get a basic idea about a topic rather than reading the Wood book from cover to cover.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Sue about Hakim, it is so much more enjoyable to read. Wood presents all the facts but I like Hakim's style better. As Kindergarten teachers we look for a more stimulating read.
DeleteI also liked Hakim's storytelling approach when dealing with the complexities of American history. Wood's text was so dry and was simply not engaging for the reader. By sharing personal information (i.e. Jefferson being young and shy) about the 'historical figures' she presents them as real people and not just a name to memorize for a history test. This is certainly more appealing to a young reader. I look forward to reading more of her books.
ReplyDeleteI used the Constitutional Convention for my comparison, and found much the same with your opinion of the Wood book. I was able to pick up new factual information for myself, but would not prefer the style of the book itself. I found myself easily distracted by little things going on around me as I tried to read through the 10 pages I needed to use for the comparison.
ReplyDeleteThe Hakim book was so engaging, and totally exciting compared to Wood. It held my attention, and gave me some great ideas for using it with my 3rd graders. I found several similarities of content with our textbook that I can expand on with even greater detail when we read through those sections next school year.
I would hope you wouldn't consider using Wood for anyone younger than an AP American history class - it's intended audience is interested adults, not students. Hakim is writing for elementary/middle school students (and may have a better printing budget!).
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you recognized the different purposes of the two books. Wood will give you the broader picture and more information, while Hakim will catch your eye and suggest interest ways to approach a topic with students. However, there are many things Hakim leaves out.